↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Flu-like and Other Systemic Drug Reactions Among Persons Receiving Weekly Rifapentine Plus Isoniazid or Daily Isoniazid for Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the PREVENT Tuberculosis Study
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2015
DOI 10.1093/cid/civ323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy R. Sterling, Ruth N. Moro, Andrey S. Borisov, Elizabeth Phillips, Gillian Shepherd, Newton Franklin Adkinson, Stephen Weis, Christine Ho, Margarita Elsa Villarino, for the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium, Timothy R. Sterling, N. Franklin Adkinson, Andrey Borisov, Jacques Grosset, Judith Hackman, Robert G. Hamilton, M. Elsa Villarino, Stephen Weis, Timothy R. Sterling, M. Elsa Villarino, Andrey S. Borisov, Nong Shang, Fred Gordin, Awal Khan, Judith Hackman, Carol Dukes Hamilton, Dick Menzies, Amy Kerrigan, C. Robert Horsburgh, Richard E. Chaisson, George McSherry, Bert Arevalo, Andrew Vernon, David G. Kleinbaum, Charles Heilig, Kimberly Fryer, Isabelle Sanchez, Suet K. Lam, Nigel Scott

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 52 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 58 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2024.
All research outputs
#2,109,727
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3,957
of 21,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,717
of 309,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#50
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.