An automated method is reported for segmenting 3-D fluid-associated abnormalities in the retina, so-called symptomatic exudate-associated derangements (SEAD), from 3-D OCT retinal images of subjects suffering from exudative age-related macular degeneration. In the first stage of a two-stage approach, retinal layers are segmented, candidate SEAD regions identified, and the retinal OCT image is flattened using a candidate-SEAD aware approach. In the second stage, a probability constrained combined graph search-graph cut method refines the candidate SEADs by integrating the candidate volumes into the graph cut cost function as probability constraints. The proposed method was evaluated on 15 spectral domain OCT images from 15 subjects undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF injection treatment. Leave-one-out evaluation resulted in a true positive volume fraction (TPVF), false positive volume fraction (FPVF) and relative volume difference ratio (RVDR) of 86.5%, 1.7%, and 12.8%, respectively. The new graph cut-graph search method significantly outperformed both the traditional graph cut and traditional graph search approaches (p < 0.01, p < 0.04) and has the potential to improve clinical management of patients with choroidal neovascularization due to exudative age-related macular degeneration.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2026.
All research outputs
#7,349,442
of 29,116,173 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#1,425
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,143
of 180,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,116,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
