Higher MICs (>2 mg/L) Predict 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Treated With Ceftolozane/Ta…

Overview of attention for article published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, September 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 56 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 42 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Higher MICs (>2 mg/L) Predict 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Treated With Ceftolozane/Tazobactam
Published in	Open Forum Infectious Diseases, September 2019
DOI	10.1093/ofid/ofz416
Pubmed ID	31660373
Authors	Olga Rodríguez-Núñez, Leonor Periañez-Parraga, Antonio Oliver, Jose M Munita, Anna Boté, Oriol Gasch, Xavier Nuvials, Aurélien Dinh, Robert Shaw, Jose M Lomas, Vicente Torres, Juanjo Castón, Rafael Araos, Lilian M Abbo, Robert Rakita, Federico Pérez, Samuel L Aitken, Cesar A Arias, M Luisa Martín-Pena, Asun Colomar, M Belén Núñez, Josep Mensa, José Antonio Martínez, Alex Soriano

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Spain	10	18%
United States	7	13%
Japan	5	9%
Chile	2	4%
Mexico	2	4%
France	1	2%
Colombia	1	2%
Hungary	1	2%
Australia	1	2%
Other	6	11%
Unknown	20	36%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	39	70%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	10	18%
Scientists	6	11%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	2%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	42	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Other	7	17%
Researcher	7	17%
Student > Ph. D. Student	6	14%
Student > Doctoral Student	3	7%
Student > Master	2	5%
Other	3	7%
Unknown	14	33%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	10	24%
Immunology and Microbiology	3	7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	2	5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	2	5%
Nursing and Health Professions	2	5%
Other	5	12%
Unknown	18	43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.

All research outputs

#1,514,280

of 33,403,089 outputs

Outputs from Open Forum Infectious Diseases

#661

of 6,724 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#25,038

of 381,632 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Open Forum Infectious Diseases

#13

of 244 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 33,403,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 6,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.