↓ Skip to main content

Anti-influenza immune plasma for the treatment of patients with severe influenza A: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anti-influenza immune plasma for the treatment of patients with severe influenza A: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30199-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

John H Beigel, Evgenia Aga, Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne, Josalyn Cho, Pablo Tebas, Carol L Clark, Jordan P Metcalf, Caroline Ozment, Kanakatte Raviprakash, Joy Beeler, H Preston Holley, Stephanie Warner, Carla Chorley, H Clifford Lane, Michael D Hughes, Richard T Davey, IRC005 Study Team, John H Beigel, Evgenia Aga, Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne, Josalyn Cho, Pablo Tebas, Carol L Clark, Jordan P Metcalf, Caroline Ozment, Kanakatte Raviprakash, Joy Beeler, H. Preston Holley, Stephanie Warner, Carla Chorley, H. Clifford Lane, Michael D Hughes, Richard T Davey, Michelle Barron, Aveh Bastani, Philippe Bauer, William Borkowsky, Charles Cairns, Jaime Deville, Marie-Carmelle Elie, Carl Fichtenbaum, Robert Finberg, Mamta Jain, David Kaufman, Michael Lin, John Lin, Ryan Maves, Lee Morrow, Minh-Hong Nguyen, Pauline Park, Christopher Polk, Adrienne Randolph, Suchitra Rao, Lewis Rubinson, Christina Schofield, Shmuel Shoham, Erika Stalets, Renee D Stapleton

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 56 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 64 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,067,364
of 31,078,525 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#672
of 3,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,160
of 375,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#15
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,078,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.