↓ Skip to main content

Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in Serbia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in Serbia
Published in
European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), May 2017
DOI 10.1097/cej.0000000000000247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena Scepanovic, Olivera Jovanovic, Dusan Keber, Ivan Jovanovic, Dragan Miljus, Goran Nikolic, Bojan Kovacevic, Aleksandra Pavlovic, Predrag Dugalic, Aleksandar Nagorni, Sasa Grgov, Slavko Knezevic, Predrag Milenkovic, Nenad Perisic, Jean Faivre

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is becoming a major public health problem in the Republic of Serbia. Organized mass screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality and even its incidence. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability of a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin proposed by primary care physicians. From August to November 2013, a pilot study for CRC screening was organized in individuals aged 50 to 74 years. The study included 50 primary healthcare centres from all 25 administrative regions of Serbia. A qualitative immunochromatographic faecal immunochemical test for human haemoglobin detection was used. Overall, 50 894 individuals were invited. The participation rate was 67.8 and 3.4% of the tests were positive. Among individuals with a positive test, 69.7% agreed to undergo colonoscopy. The positive predictive value was 27.1% for adenoma and 14.6% for carcinoma. This was the first CRC screening project encompassing approximately one-third of primary healthcare facilities in all regions across the country. It showed a good response of the target population and satisfactory cooperation of the healthcare professionals involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Computer Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
#906
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,139
of 324,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.