↓ Skip to main content

Discriminating Protective from Nonprotective Plasmodium-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Discriminating Protective from Nonprotective Plasmodium-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, May 2016
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1600155
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite decades of research, malaria remains a global health crisis. Current subunit vaccine approaches do not provide efficient long-term, sterilizing immunity againstPlasmodiuminfections in humans. Conversely, whole parasite vaccinations with their larger array of target Ags have conferred long-lasting sterilizing protection to humans. Similar studies in rodent models of malaria reveal that CD8(+)T cells play a critical role in liver-stage immunity after whole parasite vaccination. However, it is unknown whether all CD8(+)T cell specificities elicited by whole parasite vaccination contribute to protection, an issue of great relevance for enhanced subunit vaccination. In this article, we show that robust CD8(+)T cell responses of similar phenotype are mounted after prime-boost immunization againstPlasmodium bergheiglideosome-associated protein 5041-48-, sporozoite-specific protein 20318-325-,thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (TRAP) 130-138-, or circumsporozoite protein (CSP) 252-260-derived epitopes in mice, but only CSP252-260- and TRAP130-138-specific CD8(+)T cells provide sterilizing immunity and reduce liver parasite burden after sporozoite challenge. Further, CD8(+)T cells specific to sporozoite surface-expressed CSP and TRAP proteins, but not intracellular glideosome-associated protein 50 and sporozoite-specific protein 20, efficiently recognize sporozoite-infected hepatocytes in vitro. These results suggest that: 1) protection-relevant antigenic targets, regardless of their immunogenic potential, must be efficiently presented by infected hepatocytes for CD8(+)T cells to eliminate liver-stagePlasmodiuminfection; and 2) proteins expressed on the surface of sporozoites may be good target Ags for protective CD8(+)T cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#3,165,653
of 30,750,361 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#1,469
of 31,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,657
of 324,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#17
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,750,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.