↓ Skip to main content

Cochlear implantation in common forms of genetic deafness

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cochlear implantation in common forms of genetic deafness
Published in
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, July 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetic factors are among the main etiologies of severe to profound hearing loss and may play an important role in cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes. While genes for common forms of deafness have been cloned, efforts to correlate the functional outcome of CIs with a genetic form of deafness carried by the patient have been largely anecdotal to date. It has been suggested that the differences in auditory performance may be explained by differences in the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells, etiology of hearing loss, and other factors. Knowledge of the specific loci and mutations involved in patients who receive cochlear implants may elucidate other factors related to CI performance. In this review article, current knowledge of cochlear implants for hereditary hearing loss will be discussed with an emphasis on relevant clinical genotype-phenotype correlations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Engineering 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2010.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#2,601
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,687
of 104,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.