↓ Skip to main content

Hoarding in obsessive–compulsive disorder: Results from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hoarding in obsessive–compulsive disorder: Results from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, July 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hoarding behavior occurs frequently in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Results from previous studies suggest that individuals with OCD who have hoarding symptoms are clinically different than non-hoarders and may represent a distinct clinical group. In the present study, we compared 235 hoarding to 389 non-hoarding participants, all of whom had OCD, collected in the course of the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study. We found that, compared to non-hoarding individuals, hoarders were more likely to have symmetry obsessions and repeating, counting, and ordering compulsions; poorer insight; more severe illness; difficulty initiating or completing tasks; and indecision. Hoarders had a greater prevalence of social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder. Hoarders also had a greater prevalence of obsessive-compulsive and dependent personality disorders. Five personality traits were independently associated with hoarding: miserliness, preoccupation with details, difficulty making decisions, odd behavior or appearance, and magical thinking. Hoarding and indecision were more prevalent in the relatives of hoarding than of non-hoarding probands. Hoarding in relatives was associated with indecision in probands, independently of proband hoarding status. The findings suggest that hoarding behavior may help differentiate a distinct clinical subgroup of people with OCD and may aggregate in some OCD families. Indecision may be a risk factor for hoarding in these families.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2012.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#2,724
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,387
of 127,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.