↓ Skip to main content

The effect of hyperoxia following cardiac arrest – A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal trials

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of hyperoxia following cardiac arrest – A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal trials
Published in
Resuscitation, January 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 45 29%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,083,871
of 31,831,650 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#1,830
of 6,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,621
of 285,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,831,650 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.