↓ Skip to main content

Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2003
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 89 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 46%
Computer Science 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,247,638
of 28,007,254 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,803
of 8,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,152
of 155,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,007,254 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.