↓ Skip to main content

Admission Criteria for Inpatient Substance Abuse/Dependence Rehabilitation: Implications for Managed Care

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Admission Criteria for Inpatient Substance Abuse/Dependence Rehabilitation: Implications for Managed Care
Published in
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd), March 1996
DOI 10.3109/10401239609149085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Craig, Marc Branches, Laure Buydens-Branchey, David Bernstein, Bonita Chapman, Warren Goldfarb, Leonard Handelsman, Robert Ness, Alec Roy, Roger Wolfsohn

Abstract

In view of recent trends toward the replacement of traditional inpatient rehabilitation programs with nonresidential services, we examined the extent to which patients currently admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for alcohol or drug abuse/dependence met published criteria suggesting a preferential need for inpatient or residential care. Over 90% of almost 300 veterans with a primary DSM-III R diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse/dependence, admitted to six New York Metropolitan Area Veterans Administration Medical Centers for inpatient rehabilitation, met at least one criterion dimension considered indicative of a need for such services, with over two-thirds meeting two or more dimensions. These findings suggest a continuing need for initial primary inpatient or residential rehabilitation for such patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#31,363,194
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#483
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,654
of 38,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.