↓ Skip to main content

Neuro‐ophthalmology of invasive fungal sinusitis: 14 consecutive patients and a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neuro‐ophthalmology of invasive fungal sinusitis: 14 consecutive patients and a review of the literature
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/ceo.12055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 19 29%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,469,499
of 29,868,835 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#251
of 1,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,688
of 306,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,868,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.