↓ Skip to main content

Mental Health Status of the Hmong Americans in 2011: Three Decades Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mental Health Status of the Hmong Americans in 2011: Three Decades Revisited
Published in
Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, March 2012
DOI 10.1080/1536710x.2012.648117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serge Lee, Jenny Chang

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the Hmong in America and encompasses their mental health status for the past 35 years. Since their mass arrival to the United States in 1975, limited research has been compiled to track the specific mental health issues that affect this collective community alone. Major chronological research findings were compiled for this article and specific findings concerning the Hmong and their mental health issues were compared to findings for other Southeast Asian groups. In conclusion, the findings of this article indicate that the Hmong still have higher rates of being diagnosed with depression, the lowest help-seeking behaviors in utilizing Western medicine, and the lowest arithmetic average of "happiness" scaled on an assessment tool. The purpose of this article is to better steer future research projects that entail tracking and differentiating the specific mental health domains of the Hmong.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Social Sciences 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#23,297,651
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation
#51
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,410
of 203,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.