↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Cell and Gene-based Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Therapy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Advances in Cell and Gene-based Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Published in
Molecular Therapy, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/mt.2012.32
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a disease characterized by airway infection, inflammation, remodeling, and obstruction that gradually destroy the lungs. Direct delivery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene to airway epithelia may offer advantages, as the tissue is accessible for topical delivery of vectors. Yet, physical and host immune barriers in the lung present challenges for successful gene transfer to the respiratory tract. Advances in gene transfer approaches, tissue engineering, and novel animal models are generating excitement within the CF research field. This review discusses current challenges and advancements in viral and nonviral vectors, cell-based therapies, and CF animal models.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 28%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2025.
All research outputs
#7,067,355
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Therapy
#2,918
of 6,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,818
of 202,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Therapy
#43
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.