↓ Skip to main content

Calvarial Versus Long Bone: Implications for Tailoring Skeletal Tissue Engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Calvarial Versus Long Bone: Implications for Tailoring Skeletal Tissue Engineering
Published in
Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Materials Science 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#11,558,250
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews
#219
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,382
of 525,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.