↓ Skip to main content

Pneumatosis intestinalis after laparoscopic appendectomy: case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pneumatosis intestinalis after laparoscopic appendectomy: case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is the presence of intraluminal gas within the wall of the intestine. As a marker for bowel injury owing to mucosal injury, PI may herald a severe underlying disease process in patients without a significant medical history. In other cases, PI is a benign process, and expectant management is appropriate. Here, we present the first reported case of pneumatosis associated with postoperative abscess after appendectomy and its successful management. Then, we describe the pathophysiology of pneumatosis and review the literature regarding its origin and management.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2012.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#6,025
of 6,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,458
of 193,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,542 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.