↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in the circadian regulation of sleep and waking cognition in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
123 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
163 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
12 Redditors
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sex differences in the circadian regulation of sleep and waking cognition in humans
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1521637113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 416 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 15%
Student > Master 56 13%
Researcher 51 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 128 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 54 13%
Psychology 45 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 159 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#16,535
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#493
of 119,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 339,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.