You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantifying hydrologic controls on local- and landscape-scale indicators of coastal wetland loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcz144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camille L Stagg, Michael J Osland, Jena A Moon, Courtney T Hall, Laura C Feher, William R Jones, Brady R Couvillion, Stephen B Hartley, William C Vervaeke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,173,698
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#3,034
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,322
of 342,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#46
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.