↓ Skip to main content

clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters

Overview of attention for article published in OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 782)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
patent
89 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
7367 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters
Published in
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 7340 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1319 18%
Researcher 820 11%
Student > Master 738 10%
Student > Bachelor 559 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 359 5%
Other 686 9%
Unknown 2886 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1845 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 920 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 353 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 267 4%
Neuroscience 209 3%
Other 664 9%
Unknown 3109 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#453,168
of 33,825,399 outputs
Outputs from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#6
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,852
of 210,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,825,399 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.