↓ Skip to main content

Estimating population diversity with CatchAll

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimating population diversity with CatchAll
Published in
Bioinformatics, February 2012
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts075
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Bunge, Linda Woodard, Dankmar Böhning, James A. Foster, Sean Connolly, Heather K. Allen

Abstract

The massive data produced by next-generation sequencing require advanced statistical tools. We address estimating the total diversity or species richness in a population. To date, only relatively simple methods have been implemented in available software. There is a need for software employing modern, computationally intensive statistical analyses including error, goodness-of-fit and robustness assessments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Sweden 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Unknown 84 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 44%
Environmental Science 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#10,351,676
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#7,116
of 14,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,679
of 309,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#48
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.