↓ Skip to main content

Rhythms of ghrelin, leptin, and sleep in rats: effects of the normal diurnal cycle, restricted feeding, and sleep deprivation

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
2 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rhythms of ghrelin, leptin, and sleep in rats: effects of the normal diurnal cycle, restricted feeding, and sleep deprivation
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, November 2004
DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00294.2004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 21%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 44 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Neuroscience 27 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Psychology 15 7%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,649,806
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#427
of 4,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,044
of 105,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.