↓ Skip to main content

Changing Dynamics of Dissolved Organic Matter Fluorescence in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Changing Dynamics of Dissolved Organic Matter Fluorescence in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, April 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04924
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The characteristics of fluorescent components of dissolved organic matter (DOM) were examined using excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy combined with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) for seawater samples obtained from the northern Gulf of Mexico (NGoM) before, during and after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DwH) oil spill. An EEMs PARAFAC modeling of samples collected within 16 km of the well head during the oil spill in May 2010, which included one typical subsurface sample with a PAH concentration of 1.09 μg/L, identified two humic-like and two previously reported oil-like components. Compared to pre-spill levels, however, there were an order of magnitude higher fluorescence intensities associated with these components that are consistent with an oil spill source. The spectral decomposition of the EEMs data using individual and combined datasets from coastal and offshore waters impacted by the DwH spill further revealed the changing nature of fluorescent DOM composition. Although the PAHs concentrations were at pre-spill conditions after the spill in 2012 and 2013 near the DwH site, the variable and anomalous levels of fluorescence intensities and DOC concentrations three years following the spill suggest potential long-term persistence of the oil in the DOC pool in the NGoM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 17%
Chemistry 8 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,373,172
of 27,374,586 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#19,744
of 22,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,997
of 314,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#194
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,374,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.