Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Improvement Advisory for Management of Perioperative Bleeding and Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Jacob Raphael, C. David Mazer, Sudhakar Subramani, Andrew Schroeder, Mohamed Abdalla, Renata Ferreira, Philip E. Roman, Nichlesh Patel, Ian Welsby, Philip E. Greilich, Reed Harvey, Marco Ranucci, Lori B. Heller, Christa Boer, Andrew Wilkey, Steven E. Hill, Gregory A. Nuttall, Raja R. Palvadi, Prakash A. Patel, Barbara Wilkey, Brantley Gaitan, Shanna S. Hill, Jenny Kwak, John Klick, Bruce A. Bollen, Linda Shore-Lesserson, James Abernathy, Nanette Schwann, W. Travis Lau
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)
2
15%
Scientists
1
8%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,436,329
of 33,934,236 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#262
of 10,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,389
of 412,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#9
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,934,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
