You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JCS 2016 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis ― Digest Version ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0508 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fumio Terasaki, Arata Azuma, Toshihisa Anzai, Nobukazu Ishizaka, Yoshio Ishida, Mitsuaki Isobe, Takayuki Inomata, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda, Yoshinobu Eishi, Masafumi Kitakaze, Kengo Kusano, Yasushi Sakata, Noriharu Shijubo, Akihito Tsuchida, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Takatomo Nakajima, Satoshi Nakatani, Taiko Horii, Yoshikazu Yazaki, Etsuro Yamaguchi, Tetsuo Yamaguchi, Tomomi Ide, Hideo Okamura, Yasuchika Kato, Masahiko Goya, Mamoru Sakakibara, Kyoko Soejima, Toshiyuki Nagai, Hiroshi Nakamura, Takashi Noda, Takuya Hasegawa, Hideaki Morita, Tohru Ohe, Yasuki Kihara, Yoshihiko Saito, Yukihiko Sugiyama, Shin-ichiro Morimoto, Akira Yamashina, on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 56 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,923,136
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,151
of 2,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,502
of 369,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.