↓ Skip to main content

Ecosystem engineering varies spatially: a test of the vegetation modification paradigm for prairie dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecosystem engineering varies spatially: a test of the vegetation modification paradigm for prairie dogs
Published in
Ecography, April 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07614.x
Authors

Bruce W. Baker, David J. Augustine, James A. Sedgwick, Bruce C. Lubow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Germany 2 3%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 55%
Environmental Science 11 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,670,494
of 24,640,106 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,398
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,572
of 165,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#16
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,640,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.