↓ Skip to main content

The Unique Dopamine/Ecdysteroid Receptor Modulates Ethanol-Induced Sedation in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Unique Dopamine/Ecdysteroid Receptor Modulates Ethanol-Induced Sedation in Drosophila
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, April 2016
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3774-15.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Steroids profoundly influence behavioral responses to alcohol by activating canonical nuclear hormone receptors and exerting allosteric effects on ion channels. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that steroids can also trigger biological effects by directly binding G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), yet physiological roles of such unconventional steroid signaling in controlling alcohol-induced behaviors remain unclear. The dopamine/ecdysteroid receptor (DopEcR) is a GPCR that mediates nongenomic actions of ecdysteroids, the major steroid hormones in insects. Here, we report thatDrosophilaDopEcR plays a critical role in ethanol-induced sedation.DopEcRmutants took longer than control flies to become sedated during exposure to ethanol, despite having normal ethanol absorption or metabolism. RNAi-mediated knockdown ofDopEcRexpression revealed that this receptor is necessary after eclosion, and is required in particular neuronal subsets, including cholinergic and peptidergic neurons, to mediate this behavior. Additionally, flies ubiquitously overexpressingDopEcRcDNA had a tendency to become sedated quickly upon ethanol exposure. These results indicate that neuronal subset-specific expression of DopEcR in adults is required for normal sedation upon exposure to ethanol. We also obtained evidence indicating that DopEcR may promote ethanol sedation by suppressing epidermal growth factor receptor/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling. Last, genetic and pharmacological analyses suggested that in adult flies ecdysone may serve as an inverse agonist of DopEcR and suppress the sedation-promoting activity of DopEcR in the context of ethanol exposure. Our findings provide the first evidence for the involvement of nongenomic G-protein-coupled steroid receptors in the response to alcohol, and shed new light on the potential roles of steroids in alcohol-use disorders. Alcohol abuse is an alarming personal and societal burden. The improvement of prevention and treatment strategies for alcohol-use disorders requires a better understanding of their biological basis. Steroid hormones profoundly affect alcohol-induced behaviors, but the contribution of their unconventional, nongenomic actions during these responses has not yet been elucidated. We found thatDrosophilaDopEcR, a unique G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with dual specificity for dopamine and steroids, mediates noncanonical steroid actions to promote ethanol-induced sedation. Because steroid signaling and the behavioral response to alcohol are evolutionarily well conserved, our findings suggest that analogous mammalian receptors likely play important roles in alcohol-use disorders. Our work provides a foundation for further characterizing the function and mechanisms of action of nonclassical steroid GPCR signaling.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Neuroscience 13 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Psychology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#11,927,005
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#12,878
of 23,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,933
of 338,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#165
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.