You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
文豪アンドロイドに感じるリアリティと事前知識・信念の関係性の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3156/jsoft.31.5_852 |
| Authors |
Hideyuki TAKAHASHI, Junsei IZUHARA, Akiko KAIDA, Tadayoshi YAMAGUCHI, Kurima SAKAI, Tora KOYAMA, Kohei OGAWA, Hiroshi ISHIGURO |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,500,557
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
#5
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,532
of 361,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.