↓ Skip to main content

Personal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Functional Ability of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Personal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Functional Ability of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain
Published in
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000300
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic pain can significantly impair functioning of children and adolescents; however, evidence suggests that current psychological approaches have limited effect on functioning post treatment. The objective of this review is to present the current evidence for the personal and contextual factors that affect functioning and disability of children and adolescents with chronic pain, to support the evolution of new treatments. Key word searches were conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL, and PubMed from 1995 to October 2014. Studies were included if they (1) were written in English, (2) included children or adolescents with chronic pain (>3 mo), (3) had at least 1 personal attribute or 1 contextual factor, (4) had 1 measure of functional ability, and (5) had reported correlations between personal or contextual factors and functional measure. Thirty-three studies were identified which met all inclusion criteria. Several personal factors (depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and catastrophizing) and contextual/environmental factors (parenting characteristics) were consistently associated with higher levels of disability, whereas evidence for other factors was less consistent. Complex interactions between personal and contextual factors were reported. Child physical/cognitive capacities, teacher/peer behaviors, and broader cultural and environmental social systems, received little attention. Several parent and child factors were consistently linked with functional disability, whereas better family functioning was associated with functional ability. Applying an ecological framework, assisted identification of areas for further research, and provides direction for treatments that may be more effective in optimizing long-term functional outcomes, extending current psychological approaches.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 48 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 56 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,370,779
of 31,809,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#541
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,145
of 324,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,809,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.