Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the first line of defense against pathogens in the lungs of all mammalian species and therefore may constitute an appropriate therapeutic target cell in the treatment and prevention of opportunistic airway infections. Therefore, acquiring a better understanding of equine macrophage biology is of paramount importance in addressing this issue in relation to the horse.
Gene expression study of the equine AM.
To compare the transcriptome of equine AMs to that of equine peritoneal macrophages (PMs) and investigate the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the equine AM.
Cells were isolated and cryopreserved from both bronchoalveolar and peritoneal lavage fluid from systemically healthy horses after euthanasia. RNA was extracted and comparative microarray analyses were performed between AMs and PMs, and between LPS treated and untreated AMs. Comparisons were also made with published data derived from human AM studies, with particular focus on their LPS induced inflammatory status.
The comparison between AMs and PMs revealed the differential basal expression of 451 genes. Gene expression analysis revealed an alternative (M2) macrophage polarisation profile in AMs and a hybrid macrophage activation profile in PMs, a phenomenon potentially attributable to a degree of induced endotoxin tolerance. The change in gene expression profile of equine AMs following LPS stimulation revealed a significant change in the expression of 240 genes, including well known upregulated inflammatory genes. This LPS induced gene expression profile of equine AMs more closely resembled that of human macrophages than murine macrophages.
This study improves our understanding of equine macrophage biology. Our data suggest that the horse may represent a suitable animal model for the study of human macrophage-associated lung inflammation and data derived from human macrophage studies may have significant relevance to the horse. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#9,152,943
of 31,482,640 outputs
Outputs from Equine Veterinary Journal
#692
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,643
of 324,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Equine Veterinary Journal
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,482,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
