The inducer of the acute-phase response in "flu-like" viral infections is not defined. The hypothesis that virus-associated double-stranded (ds) RNA serves this function was investigated by comparison of several acute-phase responses (fever and sleep patterns, white and nucleated red blood cell levels, serum antiviral activity and ceruloplasmin) induced by the synthetic dsRNA polyriboinosinic:polyribocytidylic acid (poly[rI:rC]) with those induced by influenza virus in rabbits. The capacity of either dsRNA or influenza virus to induce hyporesponsiveness with respect to these acute-phase parameters upon rechallenge with the same agent or cross-challenge 24 h later was also examined. Poly(rI:rC) induced only minimal hyporesponsiveness to itself but was a potent inducer of hyporesponsiveness to virus with respect to fever, sleep, leukograms, and antiviral activity. Therefore, poly(rI:rC) can substitute for virus in terms of induction of acute-phase hyporesponsiveness, suggesting that dsRNA of viral origin triggers the acute-phase response in this model of influenza.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,819,413
of 27,377,461 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#4,383
of 15,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,911
of 68,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#14
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,377,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
