↓ Skip to main content

Deficient TH-1 Responses From TNF-α–matured and α-CD40–matured Dendritic Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immunotherapy, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Deficient TH-1 Responses From TNF-α–matured and α-CD40–matured Dendritic Cells
Published in
Journal of Immunotherapy, February 2008
DOI 10.1097/cji.0b013e31815eb0df
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ultimate success of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination for the active immunotherapy of neoplasia is thought to be dependent on a very large number of variables, including DC generation protocol, loading methodology, dose, route of administration, and maturation method. Although the use of a maturation cocktail comprising interleukin (IL)-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-6, and prostaglandin E2 (ITIP) has recently appeared in the literature, much of the data in the basic and clinical literature have been generated using DCs matured with the single inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha. Here, we demonstrate that DCs matured with TNF-alpha alone or in combination with CD40 agonism are highly deficient, both physiologically and functionally, in comparison with DCs matured with IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-6, and prostaglandin E2. Empirically, the data suggest that DCs matured with these agents are deficient in the induction of type 1 T-helper responses. We further speculate that DCs matured by these methods might be suboptimal for the priming of naive responses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,884,855
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immunotherapy
#496
of 1,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,173
of 186,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immunotherapy
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.