You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What’s the Tone? Easy Doesn’t Do It: Analyzing Performance and Agreement Between Off-the-Shelf Sentiment Analysis Tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communication Methods and Measures, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19312458.2019.1671966 |
| Authors |
Mark Boukes, Bob van de Velde, Theo Araujo, Rens Vliegenthart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 19% |
| Austria | 2 | 13% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 69% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 36 | 34% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,129,342
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Communication Methods and Measures
#48
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,101
of 362,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communication Methods and Measures
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.