↓ Skip to main content

The Ryder Cognitive Aid Checklist for Trauma Anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Ryder Cognitive Aid Checklist for Trauma Anesthesia
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, May 2016
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000001186
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite mixed results regarding the clinical utility of checklists, the anesthesia community is increasingly interested in advancing research around this important topic. Although several checklists have been developed to address routine perioperative care, few checklists in the anesthesia literature specifically target the management of trauma patients. We adapted a recently published "trauma and emergency checklist" for the initial phase of resuscitation and anesthesia of critically ill trauma patients into an applicable perioperative cognitive aid in the form of a pictogram that can be downloaded by the medical community. The Ryder Cognitive Aid Checklist for Trauma Anesthesia is a letter-sized, full-color document consisting of 2 pages and 5 sections. This cognitive aid describes the essential steps to be performed: before patient arrival to the hospital, on patient arrival to the hospital, during the initial assessment and management, during the resuscitation phase, and for postoperative care. A brief online survey is also presented to obtain feedback for improvement of this tool. The variability in utility of cognitive aids may be because of the specific clinical task being performed, the skill level of the individuals using the cognitive aid, overall quality of the cognitive aid, or organizational challenges. Once optimized, future research should be focused at ensuring successful implementation and customization of this tool.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#28,603,920
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#9,717
of 10,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,219
of 336,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#94
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.