↓ Skip to main content

Debriefing Medical Teams: 12 Evidence-Based Best Practices and Tips

Overview of attention for article published in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Debriefing Medical Teams: 12 Evidence-Based Best Practices and Tips
Published in
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, September 2008
DOI 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34066-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Other 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 8%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 75 28%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Psychology 24 9%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 64 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2025.
All research outputs
#3,028,460
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
#167
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,136
of 135,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.