↓ Skip to main content

Inoculation of bats with European Geomyces destructans supports the novel pathogen hypothesis for the origin of white-nose syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inoculation of bats with European Geomyces destructans supports the novel pathogen hypothesis for the origin of white-nose syndrome
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1200374109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Warnecke, James M. Turner, Trent K. Bollinger, Jeffrey M. Lorch, Vikram Misra, Paul M. Cryan, Gudrun Wibbelt, David S. Blehert, Craig K. R. Willis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Canada 5 1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 408 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 21%
Student > Bachelor 80 18%
Researcher 70 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 16%
Other 21 5%
Other 63 14%
Unknown 45 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 236 54%
Environmental Science 69 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 55 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#436,215
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,759
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,911
of 176,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#52
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.