↓ Skip to main content

Anaesthetic depth and complications after major surgery: an international, randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anaesthetic depth and complications after major surgery: an international, randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32315-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy G Short, Douglas Campbell, Christopher Frampton, Matthew T V Chan, Paul S Myles, Tomás B Corcoran, Daniel I Sessler, Gary H Mills, Juan P Cata, Thomas Painter, Kelly Byrne, Ruquan Han, Mandy H M Chu, Davina J McAllister, Kate Leslie, M Shulman, S Wallace, C Farrington, W Gallagher, A Ditoro, P Peyton, S Baulch, A Dalyell, S Sidiropoulos, J Reynolds, J Rowley, N Tan, D McCallum, E O'Loughlin, S Wong, K Owen, I-K Sim, L Glazov, P Coutts, M Pushpanathan, V Findlay, M Paech, D Cavill, A Chuan, L Pope, J Lucas, B Robinson, A Millard, S Allen, M Allen, S McKeown, P Sivalingam, T Wilkes, C Jowett, A Kearney, M Bennett, J-P Favero, S Sawhney, K Drummond, S Osborn, A Wing, J Taylor, M Edwards, H Reynolds, C Town, N Terblanche, M Challis, R Seale, K Button, R Cotter, M Stewart, N Zingerle, S Hannon, D Middleton, C Edgley, S March, T McCulloch, G Wong, S Jeong, K Connell, K Kramer, G Henderson, V Ward, Y Buller, N Hird, D Scott, L Evered, G Snyder, B Silbert, P Corcoran, E Fitzgerald, S Said, A Watson, D Baby, S Bolsin, A Marriott, K Ives, B-J Wakefeld, A Jeffreys, S Bates, R Halliwell, D Elliott, L Cope, R Paranthoiene, P Peng, X Liu, X Zhou, X Jin, H Liu, L An, W Cui, L Zhang, B Jia, J Fang, E Koo, E Lo, B Fung, M Tsang, L Lam, E Pang, V Lau, G Choi, M Tsang, B Fung, R Kwok, K Yau, B Cheng, C Lam, E Lee, D Buggy, H Keane, K Byrne, C Connolly, M Ali, A Cervantes, K Kumar, S Dandy, L Ritchie, R Kennedy, M McKellow, C Read, D France, H Truong, C Chapman, S Walker, S Olliff, H Houston, M Scott, I Minchin, A Moniwa, J McAlpine, M Chaddock, L Gray, C Czepanski, S Vinish, U Buehner, E Williams, C Zhou, L Goodman, J Bermaat, G Mans, A Garden, R Franks, J Deiterle, J Barrett, S Roubos, F van Lier, S Verbrugge, C Kalkman, J Dieleman, J Verdam-Veldkamp, A van Kampen, A Pai, A Sevillano, J Yeung, T Melody, K Atterbury, M Hough, S Dukes, S Williams, Z Milan, G Kunst, K Bhatia, W MacNab, E Weaver, R Moulding, P Doble, P Klepsch, J Self, T Howes, B Rees, B Faulkner, J Blackburn, N Crombie, L Cooper, A Nair, G Bell, R Longfellow, C Nicholas, T Garratt, M Pollard, G Brown, G Morrison, A Lang, H Dawson, M MacDonald, T Martin, E Niebrzegowska, P Dias, R Rao Baikady, S Jhanji, N Siddaiah, L Bird, R Mittal, P Nalawaya, J Sonksen, R Gidda, I Wrench, N Craw, L Pippard, S Davies, M Wright, M Turan, K Maheshwari, B Cohen, W Saasouh, P Singh, S Govindarajan, E Cuko, F Marcano, R Babazade, S Leung, S Raza, E Reville, C Hanline, S Ayad, M Buttar, Z Akhtar, A Niazi, P Saha, A Morris, C Lokhande, M Hassan, H Honar, G Bairacharya, J Saxon, D Chelnick, R Carlson, J Ruiz, J Wilks, W Williams, L Dangler, I Ifeanyi-Pillette, J Suarez, R Erfe, A Perez, R Veselis, G Yang, M Mehta, K Pryor, L Rubin, J Malhotra, M Steinkamp, F Cooke, R Friedlander

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Master 26 10%
Other 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 85 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 86 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#467,728
of 34,570,332 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,319
of 52,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,071
of 403,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#64
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,570,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.