↓ Skip to main content

Staged decline of neuronal function in vivo in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Staged decline of neuronal function in vivo in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/ncomms1783
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The accumulation of amyloid-β in the brain is an essential feature of Alzheimer's disease. However, the impact of amyloid-β-accumulation on neuronal dysfunction on the single cell level in vivo is poorly understood. Here we investigate the progression of amyloid-β load in relation to neuronal dysfunction in the visual system of the APP23×PS45 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Using in vivo two-photon calcium imaging in the visual cortex, we demonstrate that a progressive deterioration of neuronal tuning for the orientation of visual stimuli occurs in parallel with the age-dependent increase of the amyloid-β load. Importantly, we find this deterioration only in neurons that are hyperactive during spontaneous activity. This impairment of visual cortical circuit function also correlates with pronounced deficits in visual-pattern discrimination. Together, our results identify distinct stages of decline in sensory cortical performance in vivo as a function of the increased amyloid-β-load.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 246 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 24%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 15 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 31%
Neuroscience 68 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 10%
Chemistry 8 3%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2026.
All research outputs
#4,632,396
of 31,694,551 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#46,071
of 76,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,424
of 197,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#70
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,694,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.