↓ Skip to main content

The development and characterization of SDF1α-elastin-like-peptide nanoparticles for wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Controlled Release, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The development and characterization of SDF1α-elastin-like-peptide nanoparticles for wound healing
Published in
Journal of Controlled Release, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic skin wounds are characterized by poor re-epithelialization, angiogenesis and granulation. Previous work has demonstrated that topical stromal cell-derived growth factor-1 (SDF1) promotes neovascularization, resulting in faster re-epithelialization of skin wounds in diabetic mice. However, the clinical usefulness of such bioactive peptides is limited because they are rapidly degraded in the wound environment due to high levels of proteases. Here, we describe the development of a recombinant fusion protein comprised of SDF1 and an elastin-like peptide that confers the ability to self-assemble into nanoparticles. The fusion protein and recombinant human SDF1 showed similar binding characteristics, as indicated by the measured equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) for the binding of free SDF1 or the fusion protein to the CXCR4 receptor. The biological activity of SDF1-ELP, as measured by intracellular calcium release in HL60 cells was dose dependent, and also very similar to that of free SDF1. In contrast, the biological activity of SDF1-ELP in vivo was significantly superior to that of free SDF1. When applied to full thickness skin wounds in diabetic mice, wounds treated with SDF1-ELP nanoparticles were 95% closed by day 21, and fully closed by day 28, while wounds treated with free SDF1, ELP alone, or vehicle were only 80% closed by day 21, and took 42days to fully close. In addition, the SDF1-ELP nanoparticles significantly increased the epidermal and dermal layer of the healed wound, as compared to the other groups. These results indicate that SDF1-ELP fusion protein nanoparticles are promising agents for the treatment of chronic skin wounds.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 62 51%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Chemistry 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 68 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#10,090,387
of 30,143,106 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Controlled Release
#4,553
of 11,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,831
of 299,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Controlled Release
#54
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,143,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.