Diaphragmatic weakness, due to both atrophy and contractile dysfunction, is a well-documented response following prolonged mechanical ventilation. Evidence indicates that activation of the proteases calpain and caspase-3 is essential for mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragmatic weakness to occur. We tested the hypothesis that a regulatory cross-talk exists between calpain and caspase-3 in the diaphragm during prolonged mechanical ventilation. To test this prediction, we determined whether selective pharmacological inhibition of calpain would prevent activation of caspase-3 and conversely whether selective inhibition of caspase-3 would abate calpain activation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#7,139
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,774
of 179,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#60
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
