↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitory Control in Young Children and Its Role in Emerging Internalization

Overview of attention for article published in Child Development, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
454 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inhibitory Control in Young Children and Its Role in Emerging Internalization
Published in
Child Development, June 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01747.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grazyna Kochanska, Kathleen Murray, Tanya Y. Jacques, Amy L. Koenig, Kimberly A. Vandegeest

Abstract

We examined inhibitory control as a quality of temperament that contributes to internalization. Children were assessed twice, at 26-41 months (N = 103) and at 43-56 months (N = 99), on repeated occasions, in multiple observational contexts and using parental reports. Comprehensive behavioral batteries incorporating multiple tasks were designed to measure inhibitory control at toddler and preschool age. They had good internal consistencies, corresponded with maternal ratings, and were developmentally sensitive. Individual children's performance was significantly correlated across both assessments, indicating stable individual differences. Girls surpassed boys at both ages. Children's internalization was observed while they were alone with prohibited objects, with a mundane chore, playing games that occasioned cheating, being induced to violate standards of conduct, and assessed using maternal reports. Inhibitory control was significantly associated with internalization, both contemporaneously and as a predictor in the longitudinal sense. The implications for considering children's temperament as a significant, yet often neglected contributor to developing internalization are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 438 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 27%
Student > Master 58 13%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 75 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 256 56%
Social Sciences 34 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 104 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Child Development
#3,994
of 4,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,652
of 96,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Development
#309
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.