You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
THE EFFECTS OF SOIL FLOODING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COGONGRASS (IMPERATA CYLINDRICA), A NONINDIGENOUS INVADER OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wetlands, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0300:teosfo]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Sharon E. King, James B. Grace |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 31% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2005.
All research outputs
#7,959,472
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#251
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,018
of 40,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them