↓ Skip to main content

Does Vitamin E Prevent or Promote Cancer?

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Vitamin E Prevent or Promote Cancer?
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, May 2012
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-12-0045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chung S. Yang, Nanjoo Suh, Ah-Ng Tony Kong

Abstract

The cancer preventive activity of vitamin E has been suggested by many epidemiologic studies. However, several recent large-scale human trials with α-tocopherol, the most commonly recognized and used form of vitamin E, failed to show a cancer preventive effect. The recently finished follow-up of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) even showed higher prostate cancer incidence in subjects who took α-tocopherol supplementation. The scientific community and the general public are faced with a question: "Does vitamin E prevent or promote cancer?" Our recent results in animal models have shown the cancer preventive activity of γ- and δ-tocopherols as well as a naturally occurring mixture of tocopherols, and the lack of cancer preventive activity by α-tocopherol. On the basis of these results as well as information from the literature, we suggest that vitamin E, as ingested in the diet or in supplements that are rich in γ- and δ-tocopherols, is cancer preventive; whereas supplementation with high doses of α-tocopherol is not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#648,282
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#76
of 1,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,015
of 176,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.