You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Projected urban growth in the southeastern USA puts small streams at risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0222714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter C. Van Metre, Ian R. Waite, Sharon Qi, Barbara Mahler, Adam Terando, Michael Wieczorek, Michael Meador, Paul Bradley, Celeste Journey, Travis Schmidt, Daren Carlisle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 67% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,893,758
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,233
of 219,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,457
of 362,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#359
of 2,464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.