↓ Skip to main content

Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Psychiatry, October 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
6 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives
Published in
American Journal of Psychiatry, October 1987
DOI 10.1176/ajp.144.10.1288
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rates of mental illness were examined in 30 creative writers, 30 matched control subjects, and the first-degree relatives of both groups. The writers had a substantially higher rate of mental illness, predominantly affective disorder, with a tendency toward the bipolar subtype. There was also a higher prevalence of affective disorder and creativity in the writers' first-degree relatives, suggesting that these traits run together in families and could be genetically mediated. Both writers and control subjects had IQs in the superior range; the writers excelled only on the WAIS vocabulary subtest, confirming previous observations that intelligence and creativity are independent mental abilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Professor 9 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 49 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2025.
All research outputs
#311,440
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#273
of 9,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 16,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.