↓ Skip to main content

Sudden Insight: All-or-None Processing Revealed by Speed–Accuracy Decomposition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sudden Insight: All-or-None Processing Revealed by Speed–Accuracy Decomposition
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, January 1996
DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1443
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Issues surrounding the discreteness or continuity of cognitive processes have played a major role in experimental psychology, although there has been relatively little work that directly addresses these topics. Nevertheless, there has been a shift away from discrete models and toward continuous ones. The research reported in this article demonstrates discrete processing of information in an anagram task selected because of its similarity to insight problems, which seem subjectively to produce discrete "illumination" during processing. The authors used speed-accuracy decomposition (SAD), a relatively new technique for investigating the time course of information processing. The results of 2 experiments indicate little or no partial information in the anagram tasks, in contrast to previous research with SAD, all of which has revealed partial information. General models of human information processing must therefore be able to account for both patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 29%
Student > Master 10 13%
Professor 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 54%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Linguistics 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,284,897
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#140
of 3,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,690
of 116,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.