↓ Skip to main content

Neuropsychological tools in hepatology: a survival guide for the clinician

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Viral Hepatitis, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neuropsychological tools in hepatology: a survival guide for the clinician
Published in
Journal of Viral Hepatitis, April 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01592.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment has three main applications in clinical hepatology: (i) to detect, grade and monitor liver failure-related cognitive alterations in end-stage liver disease (hepatic encephalopathy), (ii) to substantiate complaints of attention or concentration difficulties in patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C viral infection, and (iii) to screen patients who are being considered for liver transplantation for early signs of dementia. However, there is limited agreement on how cognitive assessment should be conducted in these patients, and how results should be interpreted and used to implement clinical decisions. In this review, we summarize the available literature on neuropsychological dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis and with chronic hepatitis C viral infection and provide some guidance on how to utilize neuropsychological assessment in practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 2 5%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Psychology 10 26%
Computer Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,102,862
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Viral Hepatitis
#1,264
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,649
of 165,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Viral Hepatitis
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.