↓ Skip to main content

Expanded Adult Day Program as a Transition Option From Hospital to Home

Overview of attention for article published in Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expanded Adult Day Program as a Transition Option From Hospital to Home
Published in
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, May 2011
DOI 10.1177/1527154411409052
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article describes a pilot program for provision of postacute care (PAC) in an established adult day program. Demographic, clinical, utilization, and satisfaction data were abstracted retrospectively from program records; postdischarge readmission and emergency department visit data were obtained from the electronic health record. Comparative data were obtained from the health records of patients who were offered but declined the adult day program. Between 2005 and 2008, 78 patients requiring PAC were approached by the RN coordinator; 33 selected the adult day program, and 45 selected alternative destinations. The majority of patients had a neurological diagnosis, most commonly stroke. Participants and their family caregivers were highly satisfied with the program. The 30-day readmission rate for adult day program participants was significantly lower than that for nonparticipants. An expanded adult day program may represent a viable Transitional Care Model for selected patients and a feasible alternative to skilled nursing facility and home health care for PAC.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Other 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2012.
All research outputs
#19,074,619
of 27,658,632 outputs
Outputs from Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
#174
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,166
of 127,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,658,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.