↓ Skip to main content

The two sides of creatinine: both as bad as each other?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Disease, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The two sides of creatinine: both as bad as each other?
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Disease, July 2016
DOI 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 83 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 83 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,021,294
of 34,020,007 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Disease
#1,643
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,783
of 340,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Disease
#51
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,020,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.