↓ Skip to main content

Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America.

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America.
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2019
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#11,362,584
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,988
of 7,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,407
of 414,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#72
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.