↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in Obtaining HIV Testing in an Acute Involuntary Inpatient Psychiatric Setting

Overview of attention for article published in JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges in Obtaining HIV Testing in an Acute Involuntary Inpatient Psychiatric Setting
Published in
JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jana.2016.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Weller, Gwen Levitt, Robert Myers, Aaron Riley, Celsius-Kit Gesmundo

Abstract

Even in health care professions, a stigma remains for patients with co-occurring HIV and serious mental illness. Researchers at a large, urban medical center encountered this stigma when they attempted to initiate a study of cognition in psychiatric inpatients with and without HIV who were seen as vulnerable in the context of research. Education efforts and advocacy on the part of the research team was instrumental and resulted in system-wide changes in the hospital, including the addition of HIV testing to the psychiatric admission laboratory panel. Within the first year that routine laboratory orders included an HIV test, the rate of testing ordered by inpatient-attending psychiatrists reached 60% of admissions. As of 2014, 13 HIV tests were found to be HIV seropositive in inpatients, with four of those cases classified as new-onset, as opposed to two positive tests in the year prior to our study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 21%
Psychology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
#294
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,707
of 338,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JANAC: Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.